Black Friday 2015

How this empire will lie when
in a century or so
it laughs its last choking joke
and flies farther than angels ken.

The waves of both maria,
maria vostra, not mine,
bring sad legs to these templa,
shrines of strange gods with pretty shine.

Their tired missionaries
take the gospel of self to
other shores. After one, two
years, they take off, leaving us to ourselves.

In this particular mound
of brown and black, I wander
lone, and not one spoken sound,
one whiff of skin, is tender
strange, without being familiar.

How does one live the life
of self in a community of selves?
It is a severed life
in the land which these people delved,
foundations for the sacrifice of speech,
the awkardification of the meeting of eyes.

(I realize in writing this I am angry. I want in. There is tension in being intentional against other good news—and you, reader, read my fingers in their natural state.)

How does one be in but
not of this religious
swimming pool of all worlds?

Day before Thanksgiving, 2015

I am listening to The xx and Daughter. Daughter is a emo-folk-rock band, emphasis on “emo.” The xx is super minimalistic. Solo guitar intro most of the time. Singing in the lower register. Bass is intermittent. Not minimalistic in the sense of, say, Philip Glass: repetitive and relatively simple thematically; rather, a “stripped-down” minimalistic. Bare-bones. Minimum.
The xx could easily be a perfunctory band, but what do you do when you get enthralled in a world of crepuscular understated-ness, and find that it’s beautiful, in a way? What do you do?

There are no bird’s nests outside,
not that I could see, and I see
for miles. The world is ready for
death again, as it has been ready
for floods and ages. In its little
microcosm of the grand story
of the quiet execution on
the bald hill, which was not
even a mountain, the ground
drinks up the promise of life,
and is dead for another
eternity. But not yet. And that is why

I guess the point of my writing this is that I am bored. Not just the everyday “Oh-I-am-so-bored-whatdoIdowithmylife” bored. It is boredom at a fundamental level. It isn’t like general boredom, which shows itself at the surface, but knows that there really is something to be done. This boredom, i.e. mine, stems from the palpable fact that there is nothing to do, and hence, everything to be done, if that makes sense. I suspect it doesn’t. How do you learn how to be at leisure?

a supposedly fun thing etc. – part 2

There is something bugging me about this blog, which might be the same thing that has been bugging me about most of my writing lately. I think it’s that I’m doing this whole Cool-Ironic thing with writing, and it’s really pretentious now: it’s the 21st century; the Ironic writers are done. You don’t see the Cool-Ironic in bookstores really now, except in the work of Lemony Snickett and some others.

I don’t know why it bugs me.

a supposedly fun thing I am retrying

(Notice, please, my sheer incapability of coming up with genuine O.C.[1])

Of making many blogs there is no end, and much blogging is a weariness of t)he flesh.[2]

Let’s be honest: Blogger is Google’s unwanted child. There is not much to do customization-wise; the blog which you toil at will end up looking pretty much like some other .blogspot site out there. The Android app is embarrassingly inept. It isn’t very fulfilling. It isn’t very fun.

And so here I am starting a new blog on WordPress. At the moment I am envisioning a blog shot through with a sort of hyperminimalism w/r/t[3] design and content, generally devoid of links and images (which will very likely be detrimental). A kind of aesthetic of self-contained anti-aestheticism. Whatever that means. Just look at the blog.

In my last blog, I got into a slump in which I wrote *shudder* poems. I read (read: reed) it and it’s terribly awkward. I have no idea why, but starting a new blog seemed like the best thing to remedy the awkwardness.

I suffer from poor vision, both in real life and in most projects. I do not know what this blog will be about, how it will end up. Most things in life seem to be like that. In any case, my later posts should set the tone fairly clearly, but a tone doesn’t have to be the defining characteristic of a blog, I don’t think. I may be wrong.

Very often my writing and my posts reflect, either explicitly or in spirit, what I am reading, listening to, or watching. For example, I once wrote and posted a 100-plus-line “what-in-the-world-is-this-talking-about”-sort of poem about some travellers who find Priam, Achilles, Nestor, and the whole Homer gang “abstracted into wizened cadavers,” which (the poem) drew so much from Jorge Luis Borges it isn’t even funny. I wrote a short poem after listening to a good deal of Bob Dylan. This post evinces David Foster Wallace’s influence so much it’s a bit sad. (And even that previous sentence is so D.F.W.-esque.)

My writing (or any creative work really) is fundamentally derivative. I have little artistic originality, and whatever output I produce is in response to some stimulus, which stimulus is usually easily deduced if it is not plainly mentioned. Some writers are characterized by derivativeness – Borges, Dante, Umberto Eco, Derek Walcott – but the works of these are generally so fresh and ingenious in their handling of their sources that they are unequivocally worthy of the label “original.”

I can only hope to be half as good as “original” one day.

fin

_________________________

footnotesforthosewhoreadthem:

[1] “O.C.” is original content, if you’re too lazy to google. The title of the blog and the title of this post are both references to two (pop?) cultural references, to wit: Death Cab for Cutie (band), You Can Play These Songs With Chords; David Foster Wallace (author), A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again.

[2] Not actually true. There was a time in which I blogged with energy, and it was very stimulating. Also not true because this is only my second blog. Although: one can easily imagine this to be one portion of a protracted continuum of weariness. (If you noticed, this sentence [the one being footnoted] is another example of my inability to not reference some literary or artsy entity. The literary entity being referenced is Ecclesiastes 12:12b. You’re welcome.)

[3] i.e., with regard to. Which acronym (? [Is that the right word, acronym?]) is another reference to David Foster Wallace (D.F.W. for short, which is, amusingly, only one syllable shorter than David Foster Wallace). I have just been on a D.F.W.-spree* which influences me to imitate his style, which has been described by one blogger as “next-level.” I don’t know what that means, but it’s true. (Incidentally, the same blogger urged writers not to imitate D.F.W., because the only writer who was writing with that “next-level D.F.W.” quality was D.F.W. himself.)

* I have these on-and-off sprees during which I try to learn biographical factoids and trivia about certain Very Interesting (i.e., Weird) People. Subjects from the last few years include Glenn Gould and G.K. Chesterton. (Also, this footnote to a footnote is yet another reference to the frantically verbose D.F.W., who did this trick pretty often. I like D.F.W.)